Welcome or Title

Page description goes here!

Required

 
 

Required Reading

Logic & Contemporary Rhetoric Chapter 4


   

Objectives

 
 

Students successfully completing this course will:

  • recognize and avoid rhetorical abuses in writing, including common logical fallacies;
  • incorporate academic-quality research and resources into writing;
  • use college-level writing skills to summarize, evaluate, analyze, and persuade;
  • appropriately cite all sources used in the preparation of course work.
   

Resources

 
 
EditRegion8
   

Week 10 Intro & Task Descriptions

 
 

About this week...

This week, as well as our remaining fallacy examinations, will follow the Week 9 pattern. You'll read about specific fallacies and examine one or more articles about your final project subject to see if they contain any of the fallacies of the week.

10a Fallacies 3

Ad hominem

Two wrongs make a right

These are three of the frequently used fallacies. Basically, they ask us to reject an argument because there is something wrong with the arguer ... not the argument ... and if caught doing something inappropriate, to accept the behavior because others have done the same thing and probably been even worse. In the case of hasty conclusion, sometimes called hasty generalization, the arguer is leaping to a conclusion before having enough evidence.

10b Fallacies 4

Irrelevant reason

Appeal to Ignorance

Slippery Slope

These three are often used, too. They are a bit more subtle, so be careful about how you apply their definitions to passages in the articles.

 

In both 10a and 10b you would be well advised to use opinion pieces as opposed to straight news pieces. The usual pattern in straight news is to use a fallacious quote from one of the arguers in a debate. In that case, it is not the news story that is false; it is the point made by the one being quoted. However, most of the time the one being quoted is being used to strengthen the understanding of an argument, not to undermine it.

In addition to the required chapter reading, use the resources below to gain a strong understanding of these fallacies before you begin to look for them.

All sources used, whether quoted, summarized, or paraphrased, MUST be properly cited in MLA style in-text and in a list of works cited in your discussion posts.

 
   

Week 10 Assessment Rubric

 

This is the assessment rubric I will use to evaluate the discussions this week.

GD (Graded Discussion)
Assessment Rubric
Possible
Earned
10a
10b
Timing
First post no later than Thursday
1
1
2
Frequency
At least 3 well-developed posts in each discussion.
3
3
6
Quality
* 5-7 pts per high-quality post
* 3-4 pts per medium-quality post
* 0-2 pts per low-quality post
21
21
42
Total Earned
50
Comments:

For grading quality I choose the 3 best posts made in a discussion. The more posts you make, the more chances you have of crafting 3 that are excellent.

Each post should be at least one well-crafted paragraph and add value to the discussion. This can be done in a variety of ways:
* provide evidence of understanding assigned materials;
* engage with the ideas of others in the class;
* integrate ideas from experts (yes, research);
* include well supported interpretations;
* demonstrate a clear understanding of the facts; etc.
* All posts should be clearly written and carefully edited to eliminate grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Quality criteria

*High quality (5-7 pts.) = Purposeful development; clear evidence of understanding reading assignments; extends the boundaries of the discussion but remains focused on topic; may demonstrate synthesis of ideas from multiple sources; there are few or no grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors.

*Medium quality (3-4 pts.) = Moderate development; shows evidence of reading assignments; may lack depth or show some lack of comprehension; there may be grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors, but they do not interfere with the meaning in the post.

*Low quality (0-2 pts.) =  Limited in scope, development, and correctness; may simply agree or disagree with another in the class; little if any evidence of having read the assignments; may be numerous grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors. Note: posts that simply agree or disagree will earn little, if any, credit.