Welcome or Title

Page description goes here!

Required

 
 

Required Reading

Logic & Contemporary Rhetoric Chapter 10
How to Analyze a Political Cartoon
Analyzing a Visual Argument


   

Objectives

 
 

Students will be able to:

  • recognize and use elements of argumentation such as premises, conclusions, evidence, values, assumptions, etc.;
  • recognize how values and worldview affect response to arguments;
  • evaluate non-fiction texts for quality, credibility, and validity;
  • create, analyze, and evaluate written work collaboratively;
  • recognize and avoid rhetorical abuses in writing, including common logical fallacies;
  • incorporate academic-quality research and resources into writing;
  • use college-level writing skills to summarize, evaluate, analyze, and persuade;
  • appropriately cite all sources used in the preparation of course work.
   

Week 7 Intro & Task Descriptions

 
 

Introduction

"Be able to analyze statistics, which can be used to support or undercut almost any argument." ~ Marilyn vos Savant

"Democracy is an abuse of statistics." ~ Jorge Luis Borges

"I think all of us certainly believed the statistics which said that probably 88% chance of mission success and maybe 96% chance of survival. And we were willing to take those odds." ~ Alan Shepard

"Statistics show that of those who contract the habit of eating, very few survive." ~ George Bernard Shaw

"There are lies, damned lies and statistics." ~ Mark Twain

"In 2007, there were three major acquisitions of “business intelligence” firms: in April, Oracle purchased Hyperion Solutions Corp. for about $3.3 billion; in October, SAP purchase Business Objects for $4.8 billion; and, in November, IBM announced its $4.9 billion purchase of Cognos. These multi-billion dollar acquisitions of firms whose sole product is number crunching is powerful evidence that data-driven decision making has market value." ~ Ian Ayers

7a Language Manipulation 1

Arguers with high investment in the outcome of the argument, such as corporations and governments, spend a great deal of time, effort, and money on crafting arguments that are compelling and legal while at the same time subtly convincing. While focused primarily on advertising, the concepts in The Language of Advertising Claims can be used in the evaluation of textual arguments, too. And, it can help you to avoid common errors of expression and be better prepared to recognize faulty arguments.

Examine any of the articles you've already found for your project to determine if they contain anyof the weasels, and if you find them, consider how they affect the quality of the argument.

Visual arguments are fun and enlightening (sometimes), and examining how an argument is portrayed visually reveals elements not always recognizable in text or audio arguments. There's a good reason for the adage, "A picture is worth a thousand words."

 

 

7b Language Manipulation 2

 

 
   

Week 7 Assessment Rubric

 

This is the assessment rubric I will use to evaluate the discussions this week.

GD (Graded Discussion)
Assessment Rubric
Possible
Earned
7a
7b
Timing
First post no later than Thursday
1
1
2
Frequency
At least 3 well-developed posts in each discussion.
3
3
6
Quality
* 5-7 pts per high-quality post
* 3-4 pts per medium-quality post
* 0-2 pts per low-quality post
21
21
42
Total Earned
50
Comments:

For grading quality I choose the 3 best posts made in a discussion. The more posts you make, the more chances you have of crafting 3 that are excellent.

Each post should be at least one well-crafted paragraph and add value to the discussion. This can be done in a variety of ways:
* provide evidence of understanding assigned materials;
* engage with the ideas of others in the class;
* integrate ideas from experts (yes, research);
* include well supported interpretations;
* demonstrate a clear understanding of the facts; etc.
* All posts should be clearly written and carefully edited to eliminate grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Quality criteria

*High quality (5-7 pts.) = Purposeful development; clear evidence of understanding reading assignments; extends the boundaries of the discussion but remains focused on topic; may demonstrate synthesis of ideas from multiple sources; there are few or no grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors.

*Medium quality (3-4 pts.) = Moderate development; shows evidence of reading assignments; may lack depth or show some lack of comprehension; there may be grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors, but they do not interfere with the meaning in the post.

*Low quality (0-2 pts.) =  Limited in scope, development, and correctness; may simply agree or disagree with another in the class; little if any evidence of having read the assignments; may be numerous grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors. Note: posts that simply agree or disagree will earn little, if any, credit.