Welcome or Title

Page description goes here!

Required

 
 
t

Required Reading

Logic & Contemporary Rhetoric Chapter 2
Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade
Ways to support an argument

Lectures

Logos ~ Ethos ~ Pathos
Syllogism
Induction / Deduction

Guest Lectures

There are two YouTube videos in the Week 4 assignment folder. Each is about 5 minutes long. Please view both lectures. Here are direct links to those lectures:

Krista Dawn Price lecture: http://youtu.be/tAsxyffBqm0

Bruce Goodner Example: http://youtu.be/x4tTugqBkJU


   

Objectives

 
 

Students will be able to:

  • recognize and use elements of argumentation such as premises, conclusions, evidence, values, assumptions, etc.;
  • recognize how values and worldview affect response to arguments;
  • evaluate non-fiction texts for quality, credibility, and validity;
  • create, analyze, and evaluate written work collaboratively;
  • recognize and avoid rhetorical abuses in writing, including common logical fallacies;
  • incorporate academic-quality research and resources into writing;
  • use college-level writing skills to summarize, evaluate, analyze, and persuade;
  • appropriately cite all sources used in the preparation of course work.
   

Week 4 Intro & Task Descriptions

 
 

Introduction

About this week...

Arguments, especially academic written arguments, must be well supported with evidence that is not only acceptable to a variety of audiences but also stands up to scrutiny regardless of whether the audience accepts it or not. What do I mean by that? Just that using solid, factual evidence and strong, valid reasoning leads to a well-found conclusion. No one has to say, "That's a good argument." This week we will be discussing the structure of supporting an argument and how that structure may be multiplied many times in a complex argument. Then, in the following two weeks, we will discuss specific types of evidence used to support arguments.

In addition, this week we will take a good look at citation generators. There may be many of you who need to improve the grade on your Annotated Bibliography Essay, and citation generators can be a big help with the sort of detail required when conforming to a specific style.

4a Syllogism / Deductive / Inductive

These terms represent three of many ways in which argument have been categorized. Syllogism is a formal structure taught by Aristotle and undergirds much of Western thinking. Deduction and induction are broad types of argument and refer the differences in the reasoning process.

The deductive process evaluates the quality and validity of direct evidence, while the inductive process evaluates the connections of indirect evidence.

In both deductive and inductive reasoning it can be helpful to reduce the argument to a syllogism, or a series of syllogisms, because it is often the soundness and validity of the syllogism that will determine whether the argument should be accepted or rejected.

I know this all sounds a bit confusing at the moment, but this week's lectures should help to clarify these concepts. We will work on further clarification in the 4a discussion.

4b Supporting Arguments

Logos ~ Ethos ~ Pathos: Aristotle's rhetorical appeals. These represent broad forms of support for arguments.

After learning about ethos, pathos, and logos, find one opinion piece related to your final project subject. Determine which rhetorical strategies the arguer is using to convince the audience and write a summary to share as your first post in 4a.

 

 
   

Week 4 Assessment Rubric

 

This is the assessment rubric I will use to evaluate the discussions this week.

GD (Graded Discussion)
Assessment Rubric
Possible
Earned
4a
4b
Timing
First post no later than Thursday
1
1
2
Frequency
At least 3 well-developed posts in each discussion.
3
3
6
Quality
* 5-7 pts per high-quality post
* 3-4 pts per medium-quality post
* 0-2 pts per low-quality post
21
21
42
Total Earned
50
Comments:

For grading quality I choose the 3 best posts made in a discussion. The more posts you make, the more chances you have of crafting 3 that are excellent.

Each post should be at least one well-crafted paragraph and add value to the discussion. This can be done in a variety of ways:
* provide evidence of understanding assigned materials;
* engage with the ideas of others in the class;
* integrate ideas from experts (yes, research);
* include well supported interpretations;
* demonstrate a clear understanding of the facts; etc.
* All posts should be clearly written and carefully edited to eliminate grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Quality criteria

*High quality (5-7 pts.) = Purposeful development; clear evidence of understanding reading assignments; extends the boundaries of the discussion but remains focused on topic; may demonstrate synthesis of ideas from multiple sources; there are few or no grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors.

*Medium quality (3-4 pts.) = Moderate development; shows evidence of reading assignments; may lack depth or show some lack of comprehension; there may be grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors, but they do not interfere with the meaning in the post.

*Low quality (0-2 pts.) =  Limited in scope, development, and correctness; may simply agree or disagree with another in the class; little if any evidence of having read the assignments; may be numerous grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors. Note: posts that simply agree or disagree will earn little, if any, credit.