|
|
| |
Reading
Click on links to access assigned materials.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Students will be able to:
- identify the thesis, summarize the text, recognize rhetorical devices such as parallelism, and comprehend metaphorical language.
- describe, evaluate, and question the purpose, audience, organization, and style of assigned readings, as well as determine a writer’s background, historical period, and cultural niche for discussion of bias, diversity or shifting perspectives.
- carry out a research plan which entails identification of research questions, location and evaluation of sources, selection of quotes, and avoidance of plagiarism.
- demonstrate control of college-level writing skills by crafting and revising cogent, lucid arguments. The student’s writing will exhibit logical, clear thinking, control of meaning, maturity of style, and appropriate tone.
- employ thesis statements, topic sentences, supporting data, introductions, and conclusions. They will effectively incorporate source material located during research.
- demonstrate appropriate skill in common writing conventions, including standard written American English, and correct MLA documentation and formatting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduction
We're doing a bit of background learning this week, the sort of nuts and bolts basics that need to be reviewed before going forward. We're also going to begin Marijuana is Safer this week. It will be used for many of our discussions. It's available FREE online, which is why you have not been asked to purchase the book. The only real problem is that the entire book is on one web page, so it's necessary to scroll down a long list of pages as we get further into the book.
Throughout this course, and likely throughout your education, you will be required to adhere not only to standard writing conventions but also to a style of presenting your ideas and documenting the sources of information you used to develop and support those ideas. This course uses MLA (Modern Language Association) style, though there are several other options such as APA, Chicago, Turabian, etc.
In this discussion we will be exploring the requirements of MLA style in setting up a paper.
Regardless of the subject or discipline one chooses to study, there is a whole body of theories, debates, and conclusions that have already been discussed. Learning that background information is what research is all about. Without understanding what's already been discovered, one might not even be able to get started. For instance, if a neurosurgeon didn't understand what had been learned about the anatomy of a brain, it would be impossible to effectively treat a patient.
In this discussion we will be exploring the importance of past as well as present to understanding of future and how that all comes together in academic discussions. That's where the introduction to Marijuana is Safer will come in. How does an introduction to a text help us to understand the background of an on-going subject discussion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the assessment rubric I will use to evaluate the discussions this week.
GD (Graded Discussion)
Assessment Rubric |
Possible |
Earned |
2a |
2b |
| Timing |
| First post no later than Thursday |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| Frequency |
| At least 3 well-developed posts in each discussion. |
3 |
3 |
6 |
| Quality |
* 5-7 pts per high-quality post
* 3-4 pts per medium-quality post
* 0-2 pts per low-quality post |
21 |
21 |
42 |
| Total Earned |
50 |
| Comments: |
For grading quality I choose the 3 best posts made in a discussion. The more posts you make, the more chances you have of crafting 3 that are excellent.
Each post should be at least one well-crafted paragraph and add value to the discussion. This can be done in a variety of ways:
* provide evidence of understanding assigned materials;
* engage with the ideas of others in the class;
* integrate ideas from experts (yes, research);
* include well supported interpretations;
* demonstrate a clear understanding of the facts; etc.
* All posts should be clearly written and carefully edited to eliminate grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Quality criteria
*High quality (5-7 pts.) = Purposeful development; clear evidence of understanding reading assignments; extends the boundaries of the discussion but remains focused on topic; may demonstrate synthesis of ideas from multiple sources; there are few or no grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors.
*Medium quality (3-4 pts.) = Moderate development; shows evidence of reading assignments; may lack depth or show some lack of comprehension; there may be grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors, but they do not interfere with the meaning in the post.
*Low quality (0-2 pts.) = Limited in scope, development, and correctness; may simply agree or disagree with another in the class; little if any evidence of having read the assignments; may be numerous grammar, word use, punctuation or other errors. Note: posts that simply agree or disagree will earn little, if any, credit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|